Gorilla

Who would win in a fight, a grizzly bear or a silverback gorilla?

admin — Thu, 03 May 2012 19:00:34 +0000

In a neutral, open field. A 1500 lb. grizzly or a 500 lb. gorilla……. I’m thinking Grizzly?

the griz might run if he didn’t know what his opponent was

Are there villages in Africa that are starving and constantly under attack by Gorillas?

admin — Sat, 28 Apr 2012 02:40:21 +0000

If not in Africa is there any where else in the world that is? I mean Gorillas by Rebel, Militia Groups that terrorize villages and steal food and supplies.

That’s Guerrillas,The fighters not the apes.
Though when you think of it,in this case,you’d be stretched to tell the difference,Except the apes are more intelligent.

How do I get Gorilla glue off a stainless steel refrigerator?

admin — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:22:09 +0000

I spilled gorilla glue on a small section of my refrigerator. Now I am stuck with the residue. How can I remove without scratching my refrigerator.

Use nail polish remover (that contains acetone), acetone, MEK, paint remover, or gasoline (be Careful!)Use just a few drops in a cloth, have the bottles Out Side. Fumes can Ignite.

If the finish is dulled, use some Bon Ami or other scratch-free cleanser in a wet sponge, and go gently with the "grain".

Only click here if you don’t mind reading……?

admin — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:28:07 +0000

Darwin set out with one basic premise when developing his theory: "The development of living things depends on the fight for survival. The strong win the struggle. The weak are condemned to defeat and oblivion."

According to Darwin, there is a ruthless struggle for survival and an eternal conflict in nature. The strong always overcome the weak, and this enables development to take place. The subtitle he gave to his book The Origin of Species, "The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life", encapsulates that view.

Furthermore, Darwin proposed that the "fight for survival" also applied between human racial groups. According to that fantastical claim, "favoured races" were victorious in the struggle. Favoured races, in Darwin’s view, were white Europeans. African or Asian races had lagged behind in the struggle for survival. Darwin went further, and suggested that these races would soon lose the "struggle for survival" entirely, and thus disappear:

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes… will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.1

The Indian anthropologist Lalita Vidyarthi explains how Darwin’s theory of evolution imposed racism on the social sciences:

His (Darwin’s) theory of the survival of the fittest was warmly welcomed by the social scientists of the day, and they believed mankind had achieved various levels of evolution culminating in the white man’s civilization. By the second half of the nineteenth century racism was accepted as fact by the vast majority of Western scientists.2

Darwin’s source of inspiration on this subject was the British economist Thomas Malthus’s book An Essay on the Principle of Population. Left to their own devices, Malthus calculated that the human population increased rapidly. In his view, the main influences that kept populations under control were disasters such as war, famine and disease. In short, according to this brutal claim, some people had to die for others to live. Existence came to mean "permanent war."

In the 19th century, Malthus’s ideas were widely accepted. European upper class intellectuals in particular supported his cruel ideas. In the article "The Scientific Background of the Nazi ‘Race Purification’ Programme", the importance 19th century Europe attached to Malthus’s views on population is described in this way:

In the opening half of the nineteenth century, throughout Europe, members of the ruling classes gathered to discuss the newly discovered "Population problem" and to devise ways of implementing the Malthusian mandate, to increase the mortality rate of the poor: "Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations," and so forth and so on.3

As a result of this cruel policy, the weak, and those who lost the struggle for survival would be eliminated, and as a result the rapid rise in population would be balanced out. This so-called "oppression of the poor" policy was actually carried out in 19th century Britain. An industrial order was set up in which children of eight and nine were made to work sixteen hours a day in the coal mines and thousands died from the terrible conditions. The "struggle for survival" demanded by Malthus’s theory led to millions of Britons leading lives full of suffering.

Influenced by these ideas, Darwin applied this concept of conflict to all of nature, and proposed that the strong and the fittest emerged victorious from this war of existence. Moreover, he claimed that the so-called struggle for survival was a justified and unchangeable law of nature. On the other hand, he invited people to abandon their religious beliefs by denying the Creation, and thus undermined at all ethical values that might prove to be obstacles to the ruthlessness of the "struggle for survival."

Humanity has paid a heavy price in the 20th century for the dissemination of these callous views which lead people to acts of ruthlessness and cruelty.

Look.

I read this. I spent the time. There was no question here. There was nothing thought provoking here.

If you have a point, at least attempt to keep it short, and to generate discussion.

You have lost credibility. Reputation is the most important thing we have.

How to clean off gorilla glue on glasses?

admin — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:44:27 +0000

My glasses broke, so I borrowed my friend’s gorilla glue to piece them back together, but somehow the gorilla glue got onto my lens- scratch-like all over! And I’ve been wearing glasses all my life and I have horrible eyesight without them! Help please!

Nail polish remover.

Could this speed up the evolution process of Gorillas?

admin — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:29:33 +0000

Say a multi billion dollar 200 sq. mile habitat enclosure was built to hold a couple hundred Gorillas (because they are the most peaceful apes, and probably the easiest to work with on a large scale), and somehow each male Gorilla was taught sign language. Now the experiment would last hundreds upon hundreds of years (possibly thousands), but imagine this enclosure had just enough resources to sustain the Gorilla population, and the silverbacks are taught how to ask for food. So the Silverbacks that interact with humans more efficiently and effectively, will be given more food (and of course the experiment would need to be rapidly adjusted the more the Gorillas learn), and of course the amount of food Male Gorillas have is contingent on how much they mate. But do you think if this process was done, could it result in a more intelligent species of Gorilla (over say a millenium)

It’s very hard to say. Nobody could know for sure. Other things that could happen, which you may not have thought of are, gorillas may not be able to learn a sign language very well. Chimpanzees and "Bonobos" have learned sign language and do interact better with people. They’ve even been seen teaching their young the language. Also, the gorillas could simply learn that people are a source of food and come to them without having to use sign language.

A semi-similar experiment was done in Russia years ago using silver foxes. Usually they are very mean towards people, but over many generations the least mean foxes in a caged population were interbred and each subsequent generation was a little less mean until finally they were as cuddly as puppies.

Scientology or nation of islam, which belief system is crazier?

admin — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:28:15 +0000

Nation of Islam:
Founder: Wallace Muhammad-later expanded by Elijah Muhammad
Beliefs:
-White man was created in a science experiment 6000 yrs ago of the island of patmos by a mad black scientists named yakub
-the earth is 76 trillion years old
-God created himself from a single atom
-God rules with a board of 24 black scientists who elect a new god every couple million years
-That Moses used TNT(and dynamite) to destroy the Canaanites
-That instead of crucifying him, the Romans killed Jesus in front of a convenient store and put his body in a glass tube
-That Louis Farrakhan went on a spaceship called ‘The Wheel’ in Mexico city in 1985
(i) allegedly the wheel has 1500 aircraft carriers each strapped with 3 bombs that can kill someone
in a 1500 mile radius
-That there are 60,000 higher books of mathematics and that Western civilization is advanced because it is exposed to one of them(even though there are 59,999 left)
Followers:
-Malcolm x(till 1964 when he saw the truth of Elijah Muhammad, left and was ultimately assasinated in 1965
-Muhammad Ali(till 1975)
-Snoop Dogg

Scientology:
Founder: L. Ron Hubbard
Beliefs:
- That millions of years ago there were a group of people called Thetans that brought the universe into existence for their own pleasure
-That a man named lord xenu ruled a galactic confederacy and brought millions of thetans to earth in Douglas DC-8 airliners
-That they were stacked in volcanoes and then the volcanoes were detonated by hydrogen bombs, forcing the thetans to take the current forms they have
-that existence itself is characterized by a space opera
-in this space opera, the time line of the universe is as follows
(i)70 trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion (70 septemvigintillion) years ago (7×1085 years): The Story of Creation Implants
(ii)5.9 trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion years to 40.7 trillion trillion trillion trillion years ago (5.9×1060–4.07×1049 years): The Glade Implants are implanted.
(iii)40.7 trillion trillion trillion trillion years to about 83 trillion trillion trillion years ago (4.07×1049–8.3×1036 years): The Bear Goals are implanted
(iv)110,000 trillion trillion years ago or earlier to 390 trillion trillion years ago (1.1×1029–3.9×1026 years): The Invisible Picture Goals implants are implanted by an unknown alien race
(v)390 trillion trillion years ago to 370 trillion trillion years ago (3.9×1026–3.7×1026 years): The Black Thetan Goals are implanted
(vi)4 quadrillion years ago (4×1015 years): Thetans enter the present universe and experience Incident I
(vii)382 trillion years ago to 52 trillion years ago (3.82×1014–5.2×1013 years): The Helatrobus Implants are implanted
(viii)83 trillion trillion trillion to 319 trillion years ago years ago (8.3×1036–3.19×1014 years): The Gorilla Goals Implants
(ix)315 trillion years ago to 216 trillion years ago (3.15×1014–2.16×1014 years): The Aircraft Door Goals are implanted
(x)80 trillion years ago (8×1013 years): The Galactic Confederacy is established
(xi)52 trillion years ago (5.2×1013 years): The Helatrobus government is established
(xii)44 trillion years ago (4.4×1013 years, "43,891,832,611,177 years, 344 days, 10 hours, 20 minutes and 40 seconds from 10:02½ PM Daylight Greenwich Time May 9, 1963"): The Heaven Implants are given, presumably by Helatrobus
(xiii)38 trillion years ago (3.8×1013 years): Helatrobus falls or is destroyed
(xiv)75 million years ago (7.5×107 years): Xenu commits his famous genocide and brainwashes his victims with the R6 Implants
(xv)50 million years ago (5×107 years): The Body Builder Incident
(xvi)200,000 years ago (2×105 years): The Marcab Confederacy is established
(xvii)Hundreds of years ago to hundreds of thousands of years ago":- The Marcab Invasion Force implants thetans with the Train Goals
(xviii)Circa 6235 BCE: The Fifth Invader Force invades the Solar System but is defeated by the Fourth Invader Force
(xix)AD 1150: The Espinol abandon our Solar System

Followers:
Tom Cruise
John Travolta
Voice actor for sheff on South Park

So, any thoughts?

Neither.
6 billion people on the face of the earth, 6 billion different beliefs.

how much does it cost a zoo to build habitats?

admin — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:14:41 +0000

a snake, lion,tiger,brown bear, elephant, hippo, monkey, polar bear,giraffe,lizard, crocadile, cheetah, panda bear, leopared, gorilla, zebra habitat, im doin a project, and got to build a zoo

it depends how big it is, a lizard one might cost around $300

Scientology or nation of islam, which belief system is crazier?

admin — Mon, 26 Dec 2011 05:24:08 +0000

Followers:
Tom Cruise
John Travolta
Voice actor for sheff on South Park

So, any thoughts?

Both are equally illogical and potentially dangerous.

why aren’t all Atheists Vegetarians?

admin — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 01:39:10 +0000

Hopefully this question doesn’t warrant the trite responses of "You irrational, fear-mechanistic, false-God worshiping dolt who doesn’t believe in science or evidence" as I assure you it’s not the case here.

I’m attempting to simply get a pulse of how compassion and pain is viewed through the eyes of the Godless. My question is fairly simple. As a compassionate creature that doesn’t believe that man holds a special place with God (or in God’s image) then how does pain differ from a Homo Sapien to Gorilla Gorilla Gorilla (i just like saying that genus because its fun, it’s the genus name for the western lowland gorilla) and furthermore how does Gorillax3 difffer from a pig, cow, ect. How does pain from man seperate itself from creature if there is inherance spiritual seperation and no evolutionary need to eat them anymore?

Could it be that a wealthy, compassionate atheist who eats meat be somewhat of a hypocrite? I may be missing something here and could use your help on this train of thought.
judging my the answers I either worded my question incorrectly or most people didnt actually read the details
yeah, Lisa and many others just read the title and gave a knee-jerk response. Emphasis on the jerk response.
at Eiree. I contend that we are both Bachelors, you just have 1 fewer wife than I do.

It’s a horrible argument.

you should look into hisma and ahisma, that may bring a little light to your question.